Motorola Moto G 5G Plus vs Motorola Razr 2019 – Detailed Smartphone Comparison

Overall Score and Overview

Display

6.7" 1080x2520 pixels

Camera

48MP

Hardware

4-8GB RAM Snapdragon 765 5G

Battery

5000mAh 20W

Display

6.2" 876x2142 pixels

Camera

16MP

Hardware

6GB RAM Snapdragon 710

Battery

2510mAh 15W

Comparison Winner
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
with a lead of 2.2 points
Related devices
Similar to Motorola Moto G 5G Plus37.2
Similar to Motorola Razr 201935
If you're choosing between Motorola Moto G 5G Plus and Motorola Razr 2019, choose Motorola Moto G 5G Plus for better overall specifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which phone has a better camera, Motorola Moto G 5G Plus or Motorola Razr 2019?

The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus offers a significantly better camera system than the Motorola Razr 2019. It excels in superior main camera, better video recording, enhanced selfie camera.

Which display is better for everyday use?

The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus offers a better display experience with 6.7" and 1080x2520 pixels.

Which phone performs better in daily tasks?

Both phones offer comparable performance levels for daily tasks.

Which phone has better battery life and charging?

The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus offers better battery performance with 5000mAh and 20W.

Basic Information
Device Name
Motorola Moto G 5G PlusMotorola Razr 2019
Brand
MotorolaMotorola
Operating System
Android 10Android 9.0, up to Android 11
Release Date
July 8, 2020February 6, 2020
Price
About 260 EURAbout 510 EUR
Body
Dimensions
168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in)Unfolded: 172 x 72 x 6.9 mmFolded: 94 x 72 x 14mm
Weight
207 g (7.30 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
Build
Glass front, plastic back, plastic framePlastic front, plastic back, aluminum frame
SIM
Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMeSIM
Display
Display Type
IPS LCD, HDR10Foldable P-OLED
Display Size
6.7 inches, 104.9 cm26.2 inches, 86.9 cm2
Resolution
1080 x 2520 pixels876 x 2142 pixels
Refresh Rate
90HzUnknown
Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Pixel Density
409 ppi373 ppi
Screen-to-body ratio
~84.2%~70.2%
Aspect Ratio
21:9Unknown
Protection
UnknownUnknown
Main Camera
Main Camera
48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP, (macro), AF
2 MP, (depth)
16 MP, f/1.7, 1.22um, dual pixel PDAF
TOF 3D, (depth)
FeaturesDual-LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Video Recording
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie Camera
Selfie Camera
16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP, f/2.0, 1.12um
FeaturesHDRHDR
Video
1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Hardware
Chipset
Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm)Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm)
CPU
Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver)
GPU
Adreno 620Adreno 616
RAM
4-8GB RAM6GB RAM
Storage
64GB/128GB storage, microSDXC128GB storage, no card slot
Performance Tests
AnTuTu v8
299926Unknown
GeekBench v5.1
1898Unknown
Battery
Capacity
5000mAh2510mAh
Charging
20W wired15W wired
Battery life
Endurance rating 114h (old)Unknown
Network
Technology
GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
2G bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 20, 28, 38, 66 - MEA
5G bands
1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSAUnknown
Speed
HSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE
Sound
Loudspeaker
YesYes
3.5mm jack
YesNo
Communications
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth
5.1, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
Positioning
GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS
NFC
YesYes
Radio
FM radioNo
USB
USB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.0
Features
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

How Smartphones Are Evaluated: A Clear Guide to Our Rating Methodology

Choosing the right smartphone can feel overwhelming with so many options available. How do you know which phone offers the best value for your needs? Our comprehensive smartphone evaluation methodology is designed to help you understand what makes a phone stand out. We assess smartphones based on key factors like performance, camera quality, display, battery life, and more, ensuring a fair and balanced rating system. In this article, we'll break down how we evaluate smartphones in a way that's easy to understand, so you can make an informed decision. We'll also show you how our methodology applies in a sample comparison between two devices.

Why Smartphone Evaluation Matters

Smartphones are more than just communication devices—they're our cameras, entertainment hubs, and productivity tools. With prices ranging from budget-friendly to premium, it's essential to know what you're getting for your money. Our evaluation system analyzes a phone's features and performance to assign it a score, helping you compare devices across different brands and price ranges. Whether you're a tech enthusiast or a casual user, our methodology provides clarity on what makes a phone great.

Key Factors in Our Smartphone Rating System

We evaluate smartphones based on several critical components, each contributing to an overall score. Here's a look at the main factors we consider:

1. Performance: The Power Behind Your Phone

A smartphone's performance determines how smoothly it runs apps, games, and multitasking tasks. We assess performance by looking at:

  • Processor (Chipset): The brain of the phone, like Qualcomm Snapdragon, Apple A-series, or MediaTek Dimensity. Newer, more advanced chips score higher for speed and efficiency.
  • Benchmarks: We use industry-standard tests like AnTuTu and Geekbench to measure raw power, ensuring our ratings reflect real-world performance.
  • RAM: More RAM means better multitasking. We adjust expectations for iPhones, which need less RAM due to optimized software.
  • Storage Speed: Fast storage (like UFS 4.0 or NVMe in iPhones) improves app loading and file access.

For example, a phone with a high-end processor and ample RAM will score higher than one with an older chip and limited memory, but we also reward devices with excellent software optimization.

2. Camera: Capturing Your Moments

A great camera is a must for many users, whether for selfies, landscapes, or videos. Our camera evaluation includes:

  • Sensor Quality: Higher megapixels, larger sensors, and advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) boost scores.
  • Zoom and Versatility: Phones with telephoto or ultrawide lenses get extra points for flexibility.
  • Video Capabilities: Support for 8K, 4K at 60fps, or high frame rates (like 120fps) enhances the score.
  • Software Optimization: Some brands excel at processing images, so we factor in their software strengths.

We also calibrate our camera scores to align with industry benchmarks like DXOMARK, ensuring our ratings reflect professional standards. Older phones may lose points due to outdated camera tech.

3. Display: Your Window to Content

The display affects everything from watching videos to reading texts. We evaluate displays based on:

  • Type: AMOLED and OLED displays offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, scoring higher than LCDs. LTPO technology, which adjusts refresh rates, is a premium feature.
  • Resolution and PPI: Sharper displays (higher pixels per inch) score better for clarity.
  • Refresh Rate: Smooth scrolling with 120Hz or higher refresh rates earns extra points.
  • Brightness: Brighter displays (measured in nits) perform better in sunlight.

High-quality AMOLED displays often lead the pack, but we also penalize phones with lower refresh rates to keep things fair.

4. Battery Life: Keeping You Powered

A long-lasting battery is crucial for all-day use. Our battery evaluation considers:

  • Capacity: Larger batteries (measured in mAh) are normalized by display size for fairness.
  • Real-World Tests: We prioritize battery endurance test results over raw capacity.
  • Charging Speed: Faster wired and wireless charging boosts scores.
  • Features: Reverse wireless charging adds a small bonus.

Phones with efficient hardware often score well, while devices with ultra-fast charging shine in this category.

5. Software: The User Experience

Software affects usability and longevity. We rate software based on:

  • Update Support: Brands offering long-term updates (up to 7 years) earn high scores.
  • Optimization: Smooth, bloat-free software gets a boost.

Lesser-known brands may score lower if they provide shorter update periods or less polished interfaces.

6. Build Quality and Connectivity

A phone's durability and connectivity matter for everyday use. We look at:

  • Build: IP68 water and dust resistance earns higher scores than IP67 or no rating.
  • Connectivity: 5G support is a major factor, as it ensures future-proofing.

How We Combine Scores

Each component (performance, camera, etc.) receives a score from 1 to 10, weighted based on the phone's price category:

  • Premium Phones ($900+): High expectations for camera and performance, with balanced weighting.
  • High-End ($600–$900): Slightly less emphasis on cutting-edge features.
  • Mid-Range ($300–$600): Value-focused, rewarding balanced specs.
  • Entry-Level ($200–$300): Prioritizes essentials like battery and software.
  • Budget (Under $200): Focuses on reliability and core functionality.

The weighted scores are combined, adjusted for the phone's age (older phones lose points), and capped at 100. We also fine-tune scores based on brand-specific strengths, like optimization or display quality.

Real-World Example: Comparing Two Smartphones

To illustrate how our methodology works in practice, let's compare the two smartphones you are viewing right now:

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus

  • Overall Score: 37.2 points
  • Display: 6.7" 1080x2520 pixels
  • Camera: 48MP
  • Hardware: 4-8GB RAM, Snapdragon 765 5G
  • Battery: 5000mAh mAh, 20W charging

Motorola Razr 2019

  • Overall Score: 35 points
  • Display: 6.2" 876x2142 pixels
  • Camera: 16MP
  • Hardware: 6GB RAM, Snapdragon 710
  • Battery: 2510mAh mAh, 15W charging

Comparison Winner: Motorola Moto G 5G Plus with a lead of 2.2 points

Recommendation: If you're choosing between Motorola Moto G 5G Plus and Motorola Razr 2019, choose Motorola Moto G 5G Plus for better overall specifications.

In this example, Motorola Moto G 5G Plus outperforms Motorola Razr 2019, likely due to factors like its higher overall score reflecting better performance, camera, or display capabilities. This comparison highlights how our methodology balances different aspects of a phone, giving a clear winner based on overall performance while still acknowledging individual strengths.

Why Our Methodology Works

Our system is designed to be:

  • Comprehensive: Covers all major aspects of a smartphone.
  • Fair: Adjusts expectations based on price and age.
  • Transparent: Uses clear criteria and industry benchmarks.
  • User-Focused: Prioritizes features that matter to you, like camera quality and battery life.

Whether you're after a premium device, a versatile mid-range option, or a budget-friendly phone, our ratings help you find the best match for your needs.

Conclusion

Our smartphone evaluation methodology takes the guesswork out of choosing a phone. By analyzing performance, camera, display, battery, software, and build quality, we provide a clear, reliable score for every device. The sample comparison above demonstrates how our system can help you choose between two phones with different strengths. Next time you're shopping for a smartphone, use our ratings to find the perfect match for your lifestyle and budget.